Welcome to Coriolistic Anachronisms

Introducing the new jQuery sliding panel and accordion menu!

[applause]

Click on a vertical tab to the right for help and options

And enjoy your visit!
Vince

  • HOME

    Click here to visit the main photo galleries at VMP.com or stick around and click here (or on the blog header from anywhere in the blog) to reach the Coriolistic Anachronisms home page and most recent posts.

  • ABOUT

    My name is Vincent Mounier. I'm a photographer and designer of this site. My blog Coriolistic Anachronisms is now five years old. Find out more about the web site and me.

  • CONTACT

    Click here to send me an email. Enthusiastic praise, technical questions, geek jokes and constructive criticism are always welcome!

  • FAQ's

    If you have unanswered questions, why don't you check out this helpful FAQ's page. You could also email me and if your question is relevent, it might appear as a new FAQ.

  • SHARE

    Here's a one-stop social bookmarking tool for your convenience. Please use as many of the available links, I don't mind. And don't forget to subscribe to the RSS feed.

  • RULES OF CONDUCT AND COPYRIGHTS

    A few notes on what I hope will be a respectful visit, and my promise to play by the same rules. Basically, don't swear, don't steal, don't spam. Please.

  • 66 SQUARE FEET

    Let me Marie at 66 Square Feetintroduce you to my blogging and life soulmate. Different blogs, different views, different ideas, same passion.

  • SITEMAP

    A graphic, user-friendly navigational overview of the entire web site, which is made of two main sections:

    • This blog and all sub-sections,
    • Vincent Mounier Photography, where the main photo galleries are located.

You are viewing a single post; use navigation links below
or click on blog header to get most current content

Hi, I'm your friendly Coriolibot (as in "ro-bot").

It would seem Vince (shame on him) hasn't posted a fresh entry in a couple of days, so I am here to keep you entertained no matter what!

The post below is a random entry that we hope you haven't read before. Regular current entries follow. Enjoy, and come back soon for brand new posts!

Note: this random entry is served on a per-visit basis and will change if you reload the page. It will also not show up on regular RSS, Feedburner and Twitter feeds.

   Vintage! This is a random post. The year was 2006...
« No fate », carved Sarah Connor unconsciously on a piece of wood in Terminator 2. It might be a cheesy classic to quote from, but it sure addresses one of the biggest issues in life.

No fate but what we make for ourselves. Here’s quite an empowering statement that gives purpose to our life, but it’s at the same time a huge responsibility to be carrying forever on our simple shoulders. The wake up call might be rough and blaming it on ourselves when the walls come tumbling down around us is not the easiest thing to do. How much more convenient then to blame it on fate or God, and to downplay our role to that of willing puppets.

But what if both sides of the coin were actually combined into a more universal theory? What if fate was a real factor in our lives, and yet could be manipulated any way we see fit?

We’d have the best of both worlds. An infinitely powerful giant hand to guide us and lead us towards our destiny, and then also a small remote control hidden in our pocket that would allow us total control over the mighty hand. Free will combining with fate, interacting with it. Out of awareness and sometimes unconventional choices, we’d be able to alter the course of what seems to be written for us. That, in the end, might be the only real wisdom there is.

To sum it up, as it was said: « Have the strength to change the things you can change, the patience to endure the things you can’t, and the wisdom to know the difference. »

But for all this to work, one more element must be defined a little better; that’s the apparent conflict of chaos and chance vs. probability.

In comes my theory of « Fate as a tree ».

 

 Posted at 7:22 PM in Schtroumpfissime:

4 Comments

Display comments as(Linear | Threaded)
  • 1 - Sigrid says:

    « There are certain unanswerable notions and questions, such as « what was, before the Big Bang? » « how can God care about every moment of 3 billion individuals? »
    Fate is one of these unexplainable mechanisms.
    Time, as we all know, or should know, is relative.
    At every second, we have free will to take any path we choose to. Yet, everything that happens is exactly what Fate had in store for us. So it’s a sort of reverse time where we first have a choice and once this choice is made, it becomes exactly the one that was written for us all along. Thus our lives are perfect albeit sometimes unpleasant, because we are totally free to chose yet every single thing that happens was meant to be.
    Not bad, the tree theory :) »

  • 2 - Vince says:

    « I would have to respectfully disagree with you on one thing, my dear Sigfrid. I don’t think that fate applies retrospectively. I believe our own decisions brought us where we are, and then if there is a fate, it will apply onward, but never backwards... »

  • 2.1 - Sigrid answers:

    « You’re allowed to disagree, as long as you keep it respectful:) The name is Sigrid, not Sigfrid, Vinfcent.
    To me onward and backward doesn’t make sense since there is no time. You can’t have fate only at a certain starting point. You have it all along or not at all. Heck I’m no longer sure what I believe myself. If you don’t mind « I think I’m gonna lay there and think for a while... » »

  • 3 - la beloeilloise says:

    « et dire que je m’inquiète parfois à ton
    sujet... you can relax, mom... :-) »

Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed


We now go back to current chronological entries:

I was recently posting from the waterfront and mentioned a passing ship, to which someone replied: « Where’s the picture of the ship? » Well, here we go.

The ship was Princess Cruises’ Diamond Princess. She was back in Vancouver a couple of days ago and I went for a closer look. The 116,000 gross tons ship is as impressive up close as she is from a distance. Imagine a gentle giant with the looks of a spaceship and carrying up to 3700 people across the seas …

Built in Japan at the cost of a half billion dollars, the Diamond Princess (as her sister the Sapphire) is 952 feet long, has a beam (width) of 158 feet and totals 18 decks! She features very prominent enclosed and extended bridge wings and her trademark jet-engine style decorative pods on each side of her funnel. Her electric propulsion system is remarkably environment friendly and driven by a gas turbine / diesel engine combination.

As my friend Silvia was commenting as we stared in awe, mankind – despite its rather dark tendencies (see my previous post) – can certainly show tremendous imagination and infinite creativity. The things we build are simply fantastic. If only we could show the same talents when it comes to our spirituality…

[Next post will feature the love of my life when it comes to ships:
the twin sisters Club Med 1 and Club Med 2.]

 

 Posted at 11:40 PM in Photoblogs:

12 Comments

Display comments as(Linear | Threaded)
  • 1 - Sigrid says:

    « Un HLM sur eau...très peu pour moi. »

  • 2 - Vince says:

    « Ma chère Sigrid, je crains que tu n’aies rien compris. ;-)

    Premièrement, c’est de la réussite technologique et artistique que je parlais surtout. D’un point de vue purement pratique, ce navire est une merveille, deux fois et demie plus grand que le Titanic. Et sur un plan esthétique je trouve ses lignes superbes. Bon.

    Quoiqu’il en soit, ce n’est pas non plus un HLM. Il ne s’agit pas d’un logement mais d’un moyen de transport temporaire, agréable, confortable et sophistiqué. Je ne suis pas sûr de pouvoir expliquer le plaisir de prendre la mer à une terrienne, :-p mais essaie juste d’imaginer te levant à l’aube et sortant prendre ton café matinal sur le balcon de ta cabine, alors que les glaciers de l’Alaska défilent devant toi.

    Bien sur, tu as peut-être deux ou trois mille personnes regardant le spectacle avec toi. Et alors ? Si c’est le nombre de gens qui te gêne, permets moi de te rappeler que tu prends quotidiennement un train bondé à craquer pour aller travailler dans un centre-ville frénétique et cela représente une densité humaine bien plus élevée que celle du bateau…

    « Bon, faut imaginer, hein! » ;-) Moi je ne sais pas si je ferais une telle croisière, mais si c’était le cas, je voudrais ce bateau là.

    Any way, the reason for my post was mostly to point out that if we could only think as big and as magnificent with our minds and souls as we do with our toys, then we’d be all set for a real evolution... :-) »

  • 3 - Vince says:

    « Besides, if you think that’s big, you should see the Freedom of the Seas, which made her maiden voyage earlier this year. With 160,000 grt, she’s the largest cruise ship ever built, period. She’s 237 feet tall, 1,112 feet long, carries 4000 passengers and 1300 crew, and one Captain. ;-)

    And then wait for the new Genesis class, currently being designed, that will carry 5400 passengers... ;-) »

  • 4 - NewYorkAngel says:

    « Ben, moi, j’ai jamais fait de croisière non plus sur un giant boat like the one you’re talking about.(Am I mixing languages again?..This would be new!). Anyhow, for some reason that I cannot explain, I really like the picture with the chairs, the windows and the blue thingy.
    Eso era solo para hacer una diversión en medio de la conversación entre Sigrid y tu para tranquilizar el ambiente. Y otra cosa que no tiene nada que ver, has visto que estabas escribiendo un articulo sobre un barco de crucero y al mismo tiempo, en mi blog, la musica que estaba escuchando yo era ‘Take you on a cruise’. Alors, hasard ou réalité scientifique?! ;-)
    My Spanish is crap...Olé! »

  • 5 - Anonymous says:

    « I have a dream... Une croisière dans les Caraïbes ou dans les îles grecques.
    Mais il faut absolument qu’il y ait des buffets fabuleux. Must be hungry... »

  • 6 - sigrid says:

    « The picture Angel mentions is precisely the one bothering me.
    Standard, identical, rabbit cages.
    No.
    The Club Meds were the ones and only. Otherwise: no.
    As for my train, it carries about 250 people at a time. I abhor crowds. »

  • 7 - Vince says:

    « Anonymous: j’espere bien pouvoir un jour t’envoyer en croisiere dans les iles grecques, se serait bien ton tour! :-)

    NYA: we’ve got a problem; Sigrid doesn’t like modern art... ;-)

    Sigrid: I can see we’ll never agree on this. Ok, I’m calling the shipyards and cancelling Freedom of the Seas unless they make each cabin different. I can hear them scream already... Va pas etre content, l’architecte naval. ;-) »

  • 8 - Sigrid says:

    « Tu sais ce que je lui dit à l’architecte naval? :)



    (Answer: Who is John Galt?) »

  • 9 - Sigrid says:

    « Je dit, Tudi, il dit, nous disons, vous disez, ils ditz. »

  • 10 - Anonymous says:

    « Les rêves sont toujours plus beaux que la réalité. Et je refuse d’arrêter de rêver. Tant pis pour la croisière dans les îles grecques... :-) »

  • 11 - Vince says:

    « Anonymous: Correction, les rêves ne sont PAS toujours plus beaux que la réalité. Il y a des cas où la réalité est imbattable. Il n’y a qu’à me regarder. ;-)

    Sigrid: Là pour une fois, tu m’as largué... Je suppose que tu citais, mais quoi?

    NYA: If your Spanish is crap, then I’m afraid to put an adjective on mine... ;-) No querida, tu español me parece bien chévere! O así que dirían en Costa Rica, tuanis!

    Pura Vida, maje! ;-) »

  • 12 - NewYorkAngel says:

    « Sounds like I should go to costa Rica to improve my Spanish cause for now, tuanis sounds like tuna fish to me!! ;-)(You’ll have to explain please...). Pero, solo por tus palabras tan amables, un beso fuerte querido! »

Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed