Of magic, and unseeing eyes Coriolistic Anachronisms - A Vancouver Blog

Hi, I'm your friendly Coriolibot (as in "ro-bot").

It would seem Vince (shame on him) hasn't posted a fresh entry in a couple of days, so I am here to keep you entertained no matter what!

The post below is a random entry that we hope you haven't read before. Regular current entries follow. Enjoy, and come back soon for brand new posts!

Note: this random entry is served on a per-visit basis and will change if you reload the page. It will also not show up on regular RSS, Feedburner and Twitter feeds.

Feb 26
   Vintage! This is a random post. The year was 2006...
« No fate », carved Sarah Connor unconsciously on a piece of wood in Terminator 2. It might be a cheesy classic to quote from, but it sure addresses one of the biggest issues in life.

No fate but what we make for ourselves. Here’s quite an empowering statement that gives purpose to our life, but it’s at the same time a huge responsibility to be carrying forever on our simple shoulders. The wake up call might be rough and blaming it on ourselves when the walls come tumbling down around us is not the easiest thing to do. How much more convenient then to blame it on fate or God, and to downplay our role to that of willing puppets.

But what if both sides of the coin were actually combined into a more universal theory? What if fate was a real factor in our lives, and yet could be manipulated any way we see fit?

We’d have the best of both worlds. An infinitely powerful giant hand to guide us and lead us towards our destiny, and then also a small remote control hidden in our pocket that would allow us total control over the mighty hand. Free will combining with fate, interacting with it. Out of awareness and sometimes unconventional choices, we’d be able to alter the course of what seems to be written for us. That, in the end, might be the only real wisdom there is.

To sum it up, as it was said: « Have the strength to change the things you can change, the patience to endure the things you can’t, and the wisdom to know the difference. »

But for all this to work, one more element must be defined a little better; that’s the apparent conflict of chaos and chance vs. probability.

In comes my theory of « Fate as a tree ».

 

2006-02-26 16:22 • Posted in Schtroumpfissime:

4 Comments

Display comments as(Linear | Threaded)
  • 1 - Sigrid says:

    « There are certain unanswerable notions and questions, such as « what was, before the Big Bang? » « how can God care about every moment of 3 billion individuals? »
    Fate is one of these unexplainable mechanisms.
    Time, as we all know, or should know, is relative.
    At every second, we have free will to take any path we choose to. Yet, everything that happens is exactly what Fate had in store for us. So it’s a sort of reverse time where we first have a choice and once this choice is made, it becomes exactly the one that was written for us all along. Thus our lives are perfect albeit sometimes unpleasant, because we are totally free to chose yet every single thing that happens was meant to be.
    Not bad, the tree theory :) »

  • 2 - Vince says:

    « I would have to respectfully disagree with you on one thing, my dear Sigfrid. I don’t think that fate applies retrospectively. I believe our own decisions brought us where we are, and then if there is a fate, it will apply onward, but never backwards... »

  • 2.1 - Sigrid answers:

    « You’re allowed to disagree, as long as you keep it respectful:) The name is Sigrid, not Sigfrid, Vinfcent.
    To me onward and backward doesn’t make sense since there is no time. You can’t have fate only at a certain starting point. You have it all along or not at all. Heck I’m no longer sure what I believe myself. If you don’t mind « I think I’m gonna lay there and think for a while... » »

  • 3 - la beloeilloise says:

    « et dire que je m’inquiète parfois à ton
    sujet... you can relax, mom... :-) »

Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed


We now go back to current chronological entries:
Oct 26

If eyes are a mirror into one’s soul, does anybody around me even have a soul? (Sour grin)

Eyes are shifting uneasily, biased and afraid. They stare straight ahead into nothingness, preoccupied and worried, or just inert. They reflect neither joy nor interest, no spark, no life. They are tired and worn out.

All those eyes seem to have forgotten how to shine and smile. They have retreated behind high invisible walls, the impenetrable defenses of shades or the anonymous shelter of a mask. They display a perpetual busy signal and do not show any sign of actually seeing the magical world around them. And yet they constantly navigate through an extraordinary maze of colors, shapes and people, an ever-changing, infinitely complex kaleidoscope which is theirs for the taking.

What a terrible shame getting home after a journey – whether it’d be a day’s commute on the bus or a year-long trek through a strange land – and having seen nothing, having only paid attention to the inner movie of routine, fears and regrets. And the journey doesn’t only happen on the outside. A real journey evolves on two simultaneous fronts: the outside scenery and the inner voyage. The magic is all around and inside us too, as my awesome sister rightfully reminded herself recently.

So when I’m out and about, I often challenge myself to take the test. Yes, I do talk to myself.

« How much of a scene can you actually absorb? How many of the small details can you aggregate in order to get the bigger picture? How completely in the present can you locate yourself to just be here and now? And how much will you enjoy it?

Are you in the transit? What’s people’s mood like? What colors do they wear? How do they position themselves in the space they occupy? How are their eyes? How many are willing to sustain a look or even return a smile? Have you noticed someone looking happy? Have you let them know you appreciate it? Is someone wearing a stunning piece of jewelry? What is the sky telling you about the weather? Have you noticed the reflections on the streets in the rain? Is the sun drawing strange long shadows in the movie playing out the window? Can you avoid swearing at the cowboy manners of the driver and the sheep-like attitude of commuters and just be there?

Now, are you in an urban jungle? Have you noticed how the touch of man is everywhere? Have you analyzed how different styles have impregnated the very fabric of the city’s architecture? Can you appreciate the many places where craftsmen and artists have left their imprint and obviously worked on creating something out of the ordinary? Can you still manage to see the ordinary features with a new eye? The intricate mesh of the tram cables, the complex network of road signs and painted lines, the global pedestrian flows as seen from a bird’s eye, the graceful lines of skyscrapers reaching out to space, the life-long history of suffering that probably dragged that beggar to the street? Can you isolate individual sounds in the large background noise of the city’s heartbeat? A child’s laughter, the ringing of a bike’s bell, a distant ship horn, the acid cry of a seagull, a great song playing out of a car’s rolled down window, the obnoxious ring of a cell phone that makes you thrilled you are not the bearer, the clap of a nice pair of boots on asphalt, the hissing of a coffee shop’s steaming machine, a siren nearby, reminder that things could always be much worse…

Are you surrounded by nature? You are lucky. Have you reminded yourself of that fact? Have you taken a deep breath and analyzed the smells carried by the wind? Have you walked around, pushed on to the next somewhere, and then a little further? Have you noticed the warmth of an afternoon sun or the crispiness of mountain air? Have you noticed the changing light? Have you listened to the sound of your steps, crisp and squeaky in cold snow, muffled in fallen leaves, silent in thick grass or loud and indiscreet in the woods? Have you bent down to pick a flower and decided it looked better alive where it grew (unless it was to be offered, which gives its death a meaning)? Have you stopped and talked with the locals about their land, which they take for granted but know intimately?

And most importantly, have you taken a picture, lately? »

[ P.S. I often fail the test myself, but I get an A for Effort. ]

 

2006-10-26 07:44 • Posted in Schtroumpfissime:

6 Comments

Display comments as(Linear | Threaded)
  • 1 - Sigrid says:

    « Hmmm...to much food for thought for me to comment flippantly...je ne vous accompagne pas, je vais rester ici et réfléchir un petit peu... »

  • 1.1 - Vince answers:

    « Prends ton temps... Et si tu cherches les gaulois, hein, tu suis les baffes... »

  • 2 - Anonymous says:

    « ... et là, un petit géranium... »

  • 2.1 - Vince answers:

    « Non. »

  • 3 - NewYorkangel says:

    « Si. »

  • 4 - Vince says:

    « Ah on est beaux tous, tiens! 5 commentaires et on parle tous de la même chose. Vive les classiques! Mais bon, il y en a d’autres... Parce que ca y est, on a les droits! ;-) »

Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed