10th of bloody March - I should have known... Coriolistic Anachronisms - A Vancouver Blog

Hi, I'm your friendly Coriolibot (as in "ro-bot").

It would seem Vince (shame on him) hasn't posted a fresh entry in a couple of days, so I am here to keep you entertained no matter what!

The post below is a random entry that we hope you haven't read before. Regular current entries follow. Enjoy, and come back soon for brand new posts!

Note: this random entry is served on a per-visit basis and will change if you reload the page. It will also not show up on regular RSS, Feedburner and Twitter feeds.

Random Entry: The run about  
 Next: Living the questions | Previous: Point of no return
Sep 29
   Vintage! This is a random post. The year was 2006...

Since I switched from film to digital, quite a few years ago, I’d been walking in a haze, half asleep. The pictures I was taking were but ghosts of themselves. Letting the camera record a JPEG is like standing next to the Mona Lisa and sketching it on a piece of cardboard with white chalk; most of the original purity and complexity are lost and can never be restored.

I still attempted to enhance my shots on the computer, of course, but it was a messy process and would unavoidably cost me some resolution, definition or range. I’d manage to get decent small final images for the web, but often felt like I had pushed my luck a little far.

Then a few days ago, while doing research on the HDR topic – which was not giving me the results I’d expected – I stumbled upon a site which used slightly different terms and looked at things from a different angle. I read it once, the entire site, missing some of the subtleties, then read it again. And suddenly it struck me in all its simplicity: I’d been approaching digital photography from the wrong angle all along.

The secret it seems, lies in recognizing that just as traditional photographers have been incorporating darkroom work into their final output, so must digital photographers! And in order to do so, one must absolutely shoot initially in RAW format. The RAW format is the digital equivalent to an exposed but undeveloped roll of film. All the scene’s information is there, intact, untreated and uncompressed, as opposed to the JPEG format where information is interpreted and compressed by the camera, with a serious quality loss and no way back.

And so that web site spoke of « undeveloped » digital pictures, and of developing them, and it suddenly all made sense. The RAW file had become the « digital negative », my favorite photo editing program would be the darkroom and only skill and patience would allow me to reveal the digital photograph’s secrets and make it come to life.

So after years of resisting the temptation, mostly because it meant sitting on twice the capacity my memory cards would have yielded, I have finally switched from shooting JPEGs to RAWs. Nothing about the move has been easy, nor fast. I’ve effectively dropped my in-camera storage space by half. I now have images that load slowly, which nobody can view as is and on which I’ll have to spend more time to get them to exist.

But I have also gained a new playground, a mysterious Cave of Ali Baba. I’ve opened my own digital darkroom.

And what’s even more promising is that I now have the option of incorporating High Dynamic Range blending techniques into the early development process, effectively gaining an HDR negative to start with.

It will take time. I have to learn photography all over again. But I can now look at scenes with a more daring eye. I am one step closer to the creative landscape photography I’ve always dreamed of accomplishing.

The sleeper has awakened.

[The first attempts at digital developping, shot on the Seawall, will be posted in a day or two...]

Defined tags for this entry:

 

2006-09-29 11:28 • Posted in Bits and pieces: & Photoblogs:

2 Comments

Display comments as(Linear | Threaded)
  • 1 - Sigrid says:

    « Woah...read this with Les rivières pourpres in the background...too cool. THAT’s ambiance! »

  • 2 - Vince says:

    « Ah, well imagine being IN the darkroom with Les rivieres pourpres, THAT’s ambiance... ;-) »

Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed


We now go back to current chronological entries:
Mar 10

)arrow Well it seems this blog is going to slow down for a while. My brand new laptop’s LCD screen just died on me and I think I need a new inverter. Needless to say the odds of me finding one before I leave here are slightly worse than the odds I’ll become Miss Universe. My only hope is to find an old external monitor; if I don’t, I’ll have limited email access from the office, but that’s pretty much it...

Did I mention I hate f!$#%$&*#$*ing computers?

 

2005-03-10 18:25 • Posted in Bits and pieces:

2 Comments

Display comments as(Linear | Threaded)
  • 1 - RD says:

    « No wonder you hate your birthday so much - crap always happens!
    By the way, if you take another look at the photo posted on your « Farewell to the Rock » newsletter... http://www.paradise-divers.com/news13.htm
    (the one with your long hair), I think you might still have one more chance at that elusive Miss Universe title, if you find the right gown of course;-) »

  • 2 - germaine says:

    « I agree with RD. You have real good chances to gain the Miss Universe title, given that long, flowing, silky, gorgeous hair of yours. Just give yourself the opportunity to try and let
    destiny and gays decide. »

Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed